Re: maker-devel post from [e-mail] requires approval

[Carson Holt-2]

The result.maker.proteins.fasta and result.maker.transcripts.fasta files contain the filtered annotations, and the other files are for reference purposes (i.e. snap and augustus raw unfiltered output). The non_overlapping_ab_initio files contain non-redundant ab initio predictions that do not overlap a final annotation (maker file). They were called by a predictor but rejected for lack of support. If you wanted to look for a potential missing gene model, that is where it would be.

—Carson

On Dec 23, 2020, at 12:03 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the
following mailing list posting:

   List:    [hidden email]
   From:    [hidden email]
   Subject: Qusetion about the ab initio gene predictors result
   Reason:  Post by non-member to a members-only list

At your convenience, visit:

   http://yandell-lab.org/mailman/admindb/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org

to approve or deny the request.

From: nanshan yang <[hidden email]>

Subject: Qusetion about the ab initio gene predictors result

Date: December 23, 2020 at 12:03:35 AM MST

To: [hidden email]

Hi MAKER community :

I have questions about MAKER output files.I get result from ab initio gene predictors which use snap and augustus by maker,and after fasta_merge step,there are some fasta files as:

result.maker.augustus_masked.proteins.fasta
result.maker.augustus_masked.transcripts.fasta
result.maker.augustus.proteins.fasta
result.maker.augustus.transcripts.fasta
result.maker.non_overlapping_ab_initio.proteins.fasta
result.maker.non_overlapping_ab_initio.transcripts.fasta

result.maker.snap.proteins.fasta

result.maker.snap_masked..transcripts.fasta 

result.maker.snap_masked..proteins.fasta

result.maker.snap.transcripts.fasta 

result.maker.proteins.fasta
result.maker.transcripts.fasta

if i continue to analysis the fasta files,which fasta should i choose?

because i choose ab initio gene predictors,so the   result .maker.non_overlapping_ab_initio*fasta can be uesed into the downstream analysis？or the  result.maker.proteins.fasta

Thanks verymuch for any help or insights

From: [hidden email]

Subject: confirm 102e4151023f6d0466a7c780132e8ca169e86aaa

Date: December 23, 2020 at 12:03:58 AM MST

If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.

_______________________________________________
maker-devel mailing list
[hidden email]
http://yandell-lab.org/mailman/listinfo/maker-devel_yandell-lab.org